Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: Dsa migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THn food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.043 habitat: 0iFm, 0iFr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.004 embryo: Fh reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 12 12.15 (0.01248) d age at birth WarrBurr2014
tp 2190 2205 (0.006767) d time since birth at puberty WarrBurr2014
am 1.606e+04 1.6e+04 (0.003724) d life span WarrBurr2014
Lp 46.5 44.86 (0.03527) cm total length at puberty WarrBurr2014
Li 70 72.37 (0.03381) cm ultimate total length fws
Wwb 0.0042 0.004196 (0.0008574) g wet weight at birth guess, WarrBurr2014
Wwi 3493 3476 (0.004777) g ultimate wet weight fws
Ri 164.4 165 (0.003606) #/d Ultimate reprod rate WarrBurr2014

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.06555) Scop1988
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.06995) Scop1988

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Chasmistes cujus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.0583 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 21.99 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.4754 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.8033 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8006 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
s_s 0.01 0.02229 - supply stress

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • We use life history data for Chasmistes that were compiled in WarrBurr2014, when no other source was available for this species in particular.
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Bibliography

Citation