Predictions & Data for this entry
| Model: std | climate: MC, MB | migrate: Mo | phylum: |
| COMPLETE = 2.5 | ecozone: MANE, MAE, MAm | food: biCi, biPz | class: |
| MRE = 0.028 | habitat: 0jFe, jiMp | gender: D | order: |
| SMSE = 0.002 | embryo: Mc | reprod: O | family: |
Zero-variate data
| Data | Observed | Predicted | (RE) | Unit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ab | 12 | 11.55 | (0.0374) | d | age at birth | guess |
| am | 365 | 365.2 | (0.0005881) | d | life span | fishbase |
| Lp | 1.9 | 1.966 | (0.03499) | cm | total length at puberty | guess |
| Li | 3.9 | 4.083 | (0.04685) | cm | ultimate total length | fishbase |
| Lim | 4.7 | 4.756 | (0.01184) | cm | ultimate total length | fishbase |
| Wwb | 0.0002771 | 0.0002811 | (0.01438) | g | wet weight at birth | guess |
| Wwp | 0.0513 | 0.05072 | (0.01134) | g | wet weight at puberty | fishbase |
| Wwi | 0.46 | 0.4539 | (0.0133) | g | ultimate wet weight | fishbase |
| Wwim | 0.81 | 0.8182 | (0.01007) | g | ultimate wet weight | fishbase |
| Ri | 1.37 | 1.372 | (0.001919) | #/d | maximum reprod rate | fishbase |
Uni- and bivariate data
| Data | Figure | Independent variable | Dependent variable | (RE) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tL_fm |   | time since birth | total length | (0.05898) | Mesa2001 |
Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C
| Data | Generalised animal | Crystallogobius linearis | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v | 0.02 | 0.02 | cm/d | energy conductance |
| p_M | 18 | 1248 | J/d.cm^3 | vol-spec som maint |
| k_J | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1/d | maturity maint rate coefficient |
| k | 0.3 | 0.008383 | - | maintenance ratio |
| kap | 0.8 | 0.9512 | - | allocation fraction to soma |
| kap_G | 0.8 | 0.8001 | - | growth efficiency |
| kap_R | 0.95 | 0.95 | - | reproduction efficiency |
Discussion
- males are supposed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
Facts
- length-weight: weight in g = 0.00724*(TL in cm)^3.05 (Ref: fishbase)
Bibliography