Predictions & Data for this entry
| Model: std | climate: Am | migrate: | phylum: |
| COMPLETE = 2.5 | ecozone: TA | food: biHl | class: |
| MRE = 0.063 | habitat: 0bFm, biTg | gender: Dtmf | order: |
| SMSE = 0.009 | embryo: Tt | reprod: O | family: |
Zero-variate data
| Data | Observed | Predicted | (RE) | Unit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ab28 | 85 | 92.44 | (0.0875) | d | age at birth | Limp2008 |
| ab30 | 77 | 77.58 | (0.007496) | d | age at birth | Limp2008 |
| tp | 3832 | 3844 | (0.002946) | d | time since birth at puberty | Limp2008 |
| tpm | 3468 | 3498 | (0.008911) | d | time since birth at puberty for males | Limp2008 |
| am | 1.46e+04 | 1.461e+04 | (0.0005984) | d | life span | guess |
| Lb | 4.9 | 4.971 | (0.01448) | cm | carapace length at birth | Limp2008 |
| Lp | 25.2 | 25.4 | (0.007771) | cm | carapace length at puberty | Limp2008 |
| Lpm | 20.8 | 20.28 | (0.02489) | cm | carapace length at puberty for males | Limp2008 |
| Li | 36 | 31.57 | (0.1229) | cm | ultimate carapace length | Limp2008 |
| Lim | 24 | 25.64 | (0.06823) | cm | ultimate carapace length for males | Limp2008 |
| Ww0 | 31.8 | 30.56 | (0.03905) | g | initial wet weight | Limp2008 |
| Wwi | 5500 | 5628 | (0.02322) | g | ultimate wet weight | guess |
| Ri | 0.03781 | 0.03808 | (0.007264) | #/d | reprod rate at CL 24.6 | Limp2008 |
Uni- and bivariate data
| Data | Figure | Independent variable | Dependent variable | (RE) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tL_f |   | time since birth | carapace length | (0.1486) | Limp2008 |
| tL_m | | time since birth | carapace length | (0.05785) | Limp2008 |
Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C
| Data | Generalised animal | Elseya albagula | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v | 0.02 | 0.05396 | cm/d | energy conductance |
| kap | 0.8 | 0.7808 | - | allocation fraction to soma |
| kap_R | 0.95 | 0.95 | - | reproduction efficiency |
| p_M | 18 | 9.075 | J/d.cm^3 | vol-spec som maint |
| k_J | 0.002 | 0.0003499 | 1/d | maturity maint rate coefficient |
| kap_G | 0.8 | 0.7966 | - | growth efficiency |
| k | 0.3 | 0.3038 | - | maintenance ratio |
Discussion
- Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
- Temperatures are guessed
- mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females
Bibliography